- This real-food challenge is just too hard. Well, I'm sorry: what does the word 'challenge' mean to you? Did Jenny call it the Real-Food Fun Experiment? I didn't think so.
- Only well-to-do (read: rich) people can afford this. Try this: look up real-food blogs that focus on frugality. Find: well over half of the blogs are written with a focus on eating traditional food on a budget. Dried beans are cheaper than canned, fresh pasta cheaper than boxed, etc. Homemade is alomost always cheaper than 'convenience' and the savings mean we can 'splurge' on good meat and dairy products. Not that I consider avoiding huge medical bills a 'splurge.'
- The phrase 'real-food' doesn't mean anything because all food is real. A sure sign of a losing argument: hair-splitting over word meanings. If you'd prefer us to use something like 'food, that is unprocessed towards loss of nutrients or addition of chemical preservatives/GMOs, and prepared according to traditional methods' we could- but would it fit on a twitter hashtag?
- Normal people don't have time to (insert food preperation here). Really? You don't have time to grind grain? Well, read Jenny's blog- you don't have to- but I have two kids I watch full-time, go to school part-time, write for two blogs part-time and work part-time for my mom's real estate office. (Yes, I'm in RE too- for all you who insulted Jenny's apparent like of qualifications.) Yet, I have time to grind grain, and make yougurt, butter and pasta. Have you heard of a blender? How about a food processor? I can make homemade pasta in less active time than it takes to open a box of macaroni and throw it in boiling water.
I am happy to share this at Fight Back Fridays.

4 comments: